Examenul de bacalaureat naţional 2019 - Proba scrisă la Limba engleză
Examenul de
bacalaureat naţional 2019
Proba C
de evaluare a competenţelor lingvistice într-o limbă de circulaţie
internaţională studiată pe parcursul învăţământului liceal
Proba scrisă la Limba engleză
Toate filierele, profilurile şi
specializările/ calificările
Model
•
Toate subiectele
sunt obligatorii.
•
Timpul efectiv
de lucru este de 120 de minute.
ÎNŢELEGEREA
TEXTULUI CITIT
SUBIECTUL
I (40
de puncte)
Read the text
below. Are the sentences 1-5 'Right' (A) or 'Wrong' (B)? If there is not enough
information to answer 'Right' (A) or 'Wrong' (B), choose 'Doesn't say' (C).
Mark A, B or C on your exam sheet.
Math has never been my thing. I have always had a hard
time understanding it. After spending freshman and sophomore year with the same
teacher, I felt doomed for junior year. After my first day, I felt like this
was the year I was going to understand it, and I felt this because of my
teacher; Mr. Schmid. His style of teaching was basic, and simple. He always
taught at a good pace and made sure that everyone was right with him before
moving on. We took notes, did examples, worked in groups, discussed homework
and played math games every once in a while. It was the first time I actually
looked forward to coming to math class. Half way through the year, I felt I had
a good grasp on the subject. For the first time in High School, I got an ‘A’ on
a math test. I was feeling confident, but still wanted that extra push. Mr.
Schmid offered to help me with my homework during my 10th hour study hall.
Every other day during my 10th hour, I went back to the math room to discuss my
homework. There were usually about two or three other students there getting
help also. We worked our way through all of the problems on the assignment, and
if I was still a little shaky, he made up more examples till I did understand.
Somehow, he managed to completely help me and three other students in just 40
minutes. After we all finished, there was usually around five to seven minutes
left before the bell rang. That’s when we would discuss our favorite teams. We
talked about the Brewers, Packers, and Badgers. Having Mr. Schmid as my teacher
changed my views on math. I know now that it’s okay and always a good idea to
go in for extra help. I had to go on to my senior math class without Mr. Schmid
as my teacher this year. I will always remember him as “the teacher who somehow
managed to make math make sense.”
(https://www.teenink.com)
1. Mr.
Schmid was in his junior year.
A. Right B. Wrong C. Doesn’t say
2. Mr.
Schmid’s teaching style was not appreciated by authorities.
A. Right B. Wrong C. Doesn’t say
3. Mr.
Schmid helped students with their homework.
A. Right B. Wrong C. Doesn’t say
4. Mr.
Schmid disliked talking about sports teams with his students.
A. Right B. Wrong C. Doesn’t say
5. Mr.
Schmid managed to change the author’s opinion on maths.
A. Right B. Wrong C. Doesn’t say
SUBIECTUL
al II-lea (60
de puncte)
Read the text
below. For questions 1-10, choose the answer (A, B, C or D) which you think
fits best according to the text.
How to be a
successful monarch
Longevity is a
great personal achievement for a monarch, although it is not a marker of
success on its own. Queen Victoria’s 63 years and 216 days defined an age in
British history; but in terms of relative accomplishment and
reputation-building, Henry V’s nine years and 163 days – during which he won at
Agincourt and conquered France – were pretty potent too. That being said, a long reign can be a good
way to earn a lasting reputation. Elizabeth I (44 years) and Edward III (50
years) were both remarkably tenacious rulers, and although both eventually went
rather stale, they were living legends by their old age. George III (59 years)
followed much the same path. His reign ended, like Edward III’s, in the misery
of personal decay and mental collapse, but before that came victories in the
Seven Years’ War and the Napoleonic Wars, and survival during the sorely
testing American War of Independence.
Behind – or
beside – almost every successful monarch is a trusted consort. Elizabeth II has
Prince Philip. Victoria had Albert. William III (and II) and Mary II had one
another. Henry VIII began his reign with one fine queen, Catherine of Aragon,
and ended it with another, Katherine Parr – although he had to go through four
other, rather less satisfactory, versions in between. One of the most intriguing partnerships in
the history of the British monarchy was the marriage between Henry II and
Eleanor of Aquitaine in 1152. This ultimately brought Eleanor’s huge southern
French duchy into union with the English crown and the links between England
and Gascony would endure for 300 years. And since Eleanor had previously been
married to Louis VII of France, her remarriage to Henry signalled a huge shift
in continental power away from the Capetian dynasty toward the new Plantagenet
crown. Henry and Eleanor fell out dramatically in 1173–74 when the queen
encouraged her sons in a massive rebellion and was imprisoned for more than a
decade. However, she endured and emerged in old age to hold together the reigns
of Richard the Lionheart and, until her death in 1204, her youngest son, King
John.
Mary, Queen of
Scots never had the greatest judgment, and her decision to marry her cousin
Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley, in 1565 was among her worst. Darnley turned out to
be a drunken, diseased murderer, who was eventually strangled before his house
was blown up with gunpowder in 1567.
The most basic
fact of British monarchy is that it is hereditary. Its future depends on
maintaining a large royal family who can ensure that the bloodline survives, no
matter what. Notable successes in this field include Henry II – whose children
numbered three kings of England, and queens of Castile and Sicily. Edward III’s
many children restocked the Plantagenet dynasty during a lean time at the end of
the 14th century.
Even Henry VIII,
whose troubles with producing an heir had such a profound effect on English
history, managed to father three more Tudor monarchs, carrying the dynasty to
the end of the 16th century. Perhaps the greatest success of all, however, was
George III, who produced 15 children with his queen, Charlotte of
Mecklenburg-Strelitz. Two of his sons (George IV and William IV) ruled after
him, and although neither produced a direct heir, Queen Victoria (George III’s
granddaughter through his fourth son, Edward, Duke of Kent) still inherited the
crown in 1837.
It’s all very
well spreading the royal seed, but it needs to remain in the family. Henry I
fathered more than 20 children, but only two were legitimate: William the
Ætheling, who died in a shipwreck, and the Empress Matilda. When Henry died in
1135 his decision to name Matilda as his heir led to the 19-year civil war
known as the Anarchy.
Monarchy is
stamped into the landscape as much as it is written in the history books, and even
otherwise useless rulers have obtained some redemption through their building
works. To the otherwise inadequate Plantagenet rulers Henry III and Henry VI,
for example, we owe Westminster Abbey, Eton and King’s College, Cambridge.
In the Middle
Ages, kings built castles, and in that sense, all were following the lead of
their ancestor William the Conqueror, whose campaigns in England in the 11th
century were secured by building and garrisoning fortresses. During the Stuart
restoration, the classicalbaroque style flourished, under masters like
Christopher Wren (whose masterpiece was the new St Paul’s Cathedral) and
Nicholas Hawksmoor (who developed Wren’s work in Greenwich). The last great
phase of royal building came under Queen Victoria – or, rather, Prince Albert.
Balmoral was created as a royal holiday residence in Scotland, while in London
the museums and cultural spaces around South Kensington were begun under
Albert’s influence (and, later, in his memory).
Royal building
is an exercise in controlling your own legacy. Elizabeth I refused to follow
royal custom by designing her own tomb. Thus she rests in Westminster Abbey
beneath a squat, ugly effigy ordered
by James VI and I, which compares noticeably badly to the tomb of James’s
mother, Mary, Queen of Scots, whom Elizabeth had executed.
(adapted
from www.historyextra.com)
1. Why is Henry V’s reign more important than Queen Victoria’s?
A. There were no conflicts.
B. He
was a powerful king.
C. Due
to his achievements and people’s admiration.
D. He
was more powerful than Queen Victoria.
2.
What did Elizabeth I and Edward III have in common?
A. Towards
the end of their reign, they lost interest in what they were doing.
B. They
were not interested in getting married.
C. They were better than George III.
D. They
didn’t have mental problems like George III.
3. The examples of marriages given in the third paragraph prove that
A. there were
more kings than queens along the history.
B. a
queen’s reign lasts longer than a king’s reign.
C. a
successful monarch is supported by his/her consort.
D. some
kings had several marriages.
4.
Why did Eleanor quarrel with her husband, Henry II?
A. Because she supported family members in a
rebellion.
B. Because
of her previous marriage.
C. Because
of her rebellious sons.
D. Because
they could not get on with each other.
5. The continuity of the British Monarchy depends on
A. well defined political
circumstances.
B. the
period when the king/ queen reigns.
C. how
powerful the king/ queen is.
D. the number of heirs a king/ queen has.
6.
How did Victoria become Queen?
A. She
inherited the throne from William IV.
B. Her
father was previously the King of England.
C. Her
uncles didn’t have children.
D. She
inherited the crown when her grandfather died in 1837.
7. Why couldn’t Henry I be followed to the throne by one of his sons?
A. The only
legitimate one died.
B. He
preferred his daughter to his son.
C. He
did not have any legitimate children.
D. Matilda
forced him to proclaim her his heir.
8. Even if some rulers were inefficient, during their reign
A. new architectural styles
were created.
B. people
did not rebel.
C. the
construction of famous buildings began.
D. the
country prospered.
9.
Who was the first to impose a trend in building? A. the Stuarts.
B. William
the Conqueror.
C. Prince
Albert.
D. Queen
Victoria.
10. What is the meaning of “effigy” in the last paragraph?
A. tomb of a person.
B. sculpture
of a person.
C. grave
of a person.
D. coffin
of a person.
PRODUCEREA DE
MESAJE SCRISE
SUBIECTUL
I (40
de puncte)
You have recently gone to an international camp, having
spent a week abroad. Write an email to a friend, telling him/her about your
experience. Include information about where you stayed, what you did and how
you benefitted from the experience.
Write your
email in 80 - 100 words.
SUBIECTUL
al II-lea (60 de puncte)
You have recently participated in a class discussion on
the topic of education in your country. The discussion centred around solutions
to be found in order to improve the current situation, such as increased
funding and better training for teachers. You have decided to write an essay on
this topic for your teacher describing three solutions you would forward and
their beneficial effects. Write your
essay in 180 - 200 words.
sursa:
https://ebacalaureat.ro/c/subiecte-2019...
Comentarii
Trimiteți un comentariu